ME HotelM&E AI
Home › Expert Q&A › Unreasonable BAS control …

Unreasonable BAS control strategies for the hotel's air-conditioning system lead to high energy consumption and poor comfort.

Expert Q&ADavid Zhou · Low-voltage systems specialistUpdated 2026-05-04
D
David Zhou
Low-voltage systems specialist

Unreasonable BAS control strategies for the hotel's air-conditioning system lead to high energy consumption and poor comfort.

As a hotel MEP expert, in response to the typical problem you raised—"unreasonable BAS control strategy for the hotel air-conditioning system leading to high energy consumption and poor comfort"—I will provide a complete, point-by-point detailed answer from four dimensions: problem diagnosis, standard reference, control strategy optimization, and case review, based on current national standards (GB) and actual engineering cases.

---

I. Problem Diagnosis: Typical Manifestations of Unreasonable BAS Control Strategies

In actual hotel O&M, defects in BAS control strategies usually manifest as the following "three highs and two lows" phenomena:

1. Chilled water supply-return temperature difference too small ("large flow, small temperature difference")

2. Chilled water temperature control lag ("inefficient heat rejection")
3. "One-size-fits-all" operation of the fresh air system
4. Conflict between terminal reheating and supply air temperature setpoint ("simultaneous cooling and heating")
---

II. Standard Reference and Target Value Citation (GB Standards)

To address the above problems, the following national standards must be strictly followed as the optimization baseline:

1. "Design Standard for Energy Efficiency of Public Buildings"GB 50189-2015

2. "Standard for Design of Intelligent Building"GB 50314-2015
3. 《Code for Operation and Management of Air Conditioning and Ventilation Systems》GB 50365-2019
---

III. BAS Control Strategy Optimization Plan (Detailed Point by Point)

Based on the above standards, the following 6 core modifications to the BAS control logic are recommended:

1. Chilled Water System: Variable Flow Differential Pressure Reset + Temperature Difference Control


2. Cooling Tower: Approach Control + Dry/Wet-Bulb Temperature Linkage


3. Primary Air Handling Unit: Dual Control by CO₂ Concentration + Guest Room Status


4. Chiller Plant Group Control: Sequence Control Based on Load Rate


5. Eliminating Terminal Reheat: Supply Air Temperature Reset


6. Nighttime Free Cooling Mode


---

IV. Case Review (Five-Star Hotel Retrofit)

Project Background: A five-star hotel in a coastal city, with a building area of 50,000 ㎡. The air-conditioning system accounts for up to 58% of annual energy consumption. Complaints focused on: guest rooms fluctuating between hot and cold, and a stuffy lobby in summer.

Pre-Retrofit BAS Issues:

Retrofit Measures (Based on the Above Strategies):
1. Replace all pump VFDs and add terminal differential pressure sensors.
2. Install wet-bulb temperature sensors at the cooling towers and modify fan PID parameters.
3. Develop a PMS-BAS interface to adjust fresh air based on guest room status.
4. Reset supply air temperature from 12℃ to 14℃ (16℃ at low load).

Post-Retrofit Results (6-Month Measured Data):
| Metric | Before Retrofit | After Retrofit | Improvement |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Chilled water supply-return temperature difference | 2.5℃ | 5.8℃ | +132% |
| Cooling water approach | 8℃ | 3.5℃ | -56% |
| Pump energy consumption (kWh/year) | 2.8 million | 1.12 million | -60% |
| Chiller COP | 4.2 | 5.1 | +21% |
| Guest room complaints/month | 15 | 2 | -87% |
| Overall air-conditioning energy consumption | Baseline | Reduced by 32% | Annual electricity savings of approximately 1.2 million yuan |

---

V. Implementation Recommendations and Precautions

1. Hardware First: Before optimizing BAS strategies, ensure sensor accuracy (temperature, pressure, CO₂, air velocity) meets requirements (e.g., temperature sensor accuracy ±0.2℃); otherwise, the algorithm cannot converge.
2. Step-by-Step Commissioning: Do not modify all logic at once. It is recommended to first implement "pump variable frequency" and "cooling tower approach control," observe for 1 month, then add "fresh air DCV" and "supply air temperature reset."
3. Personnel Training: After BAS optimization, the engineering department must shift from "manual intervention" to "automatic monitoring." Establish an alarm mechanism: if the temperature difference remains < 3℃ for more than 30 minutes, the system automatically sends an SMS to the engineer.
4. Compliance Check: All control parameter adjustments must comply with mandatory provisions in GB 50189-2015 regarding minimum fresh air volume and indoor temperature (24-26℃ in summer), to avoid hygiene non-compliance caused by excessive energy saving.

Summary: The essence of optimizing hotel air-conditioning BAS control strategies is the shift from "extensive start-stop" to "refined prediction + dynamic adjustment." By strictly referencing standards such as GB 50189 and GB 50314, and combining practical strategies such as "differential pressure reset," "approach control," and "PMS linkage," it is possible to reduce energy consumption by 30%-40% while keeping guest room temperature fluctuation within ±1℃, completely resolving the contradiction of "high energy consumption and poor comfort."

Standard reference

GB 50189-2015GB 50314-2015GB 50365-2019GB 50189GB 50314

More from this expert

Still have a specific question? Ask a MEP expert

12 hotel MEP experts online, answers cite standard clauses you can verify.

Ask free →

Engineering reference only — verify against project conditions and the latest codes.